BrowserStack vs LambdaTest

by Gralio Mar 10, 2025

Both BrowserStack and LambdaTest are excellent choices for cross-browser and cross-device testing. BrowserStack is better for comprehensive testing with robust security and integrations, while LambdaTest shines in real-time testing and automation.

At Gralio.ai we help to simplify your decision-making process by offering detailed, side-by-side software comparisons like this one, to help you confidently choose the tool that aligns with your business goals.

This comparison was created by analysing 3440 reviews and 60 websites, saving 19 hours, 36 minutes of reading.

Logo of BrowserStack
Logo of LambdaTest

About

BrowserStack is a software testing platform that helps businesses make sure their websites and mobile apps work smoothly on different devices and browsers. It offers both manual and automated testing options, including accessibility and visual testing. BrowserStack is trusted by major companies worldwide and is known for its comprehensive coverage, ease of use, and robust security features.
LambdaTest is a cloud-based testing platform that helps companies ensure their websites and apps work flawlessly. It allows you to test on thousands of real devices and browsers, so you don't have to. LambdaTest is used by large and small companies to speed up their development process and improve the quality of their software. It stands out for its broad range of testing options and ease of use.

Summary

Main difference
BrowserStack is a comprehensive testing platform known for its wide range of integrations and robust security features. LambdaTest stands out with its real-time testing capabilities and focus on automated testing, including Cypress and Appium support.

Relative strengths of BrowserStack (compared to LambdaTest)

  • Wider range of integrations with popular development tools.

  • Stronger security features, making it suitable for sensitive data testing.

  • More comprehensive device coverage, including legacy browsers and devices.

Relative weaknesses of BrowserStack (compared to LambdaTest)

  • Can be more expensive, especially for advanced features.

  • Some users report slower performance on certain devices.

  • Accessibility testing requires a separate subscription.

What companies are using BrowserStack and LambdaTest?

No data
Rubrik is a customer
Rubrik
Telstra is a customer
Telstra
Vimeo is a customer
Vimeo
NVIDIA is a customer
NVIDIA
MicrOsoft is a customer
MicrOsoft

Who should use BrowserStack VS. LambdaTest

BrowserStack helps ensure flawless website and app performance across devices. Users praise its ease of use and device coverage. However, some find the cost and occasional slow performance a drawback. Best for teams needing comprehensive testing solutions.

LambdaTest is a cloud-based testing platform that allows businesses to test their websites and apps on thousands of real devices and browsers. Users praise its wide range of testing options, real-time testing, and integrations with popular CI/CD tools. However, some have noted occasional lags with virtual devices and UI discrepancies. LambdaTest offers a free plan and paid options starting at $15/month, making it suitable for businesses of all sizes.

  • Ideal for small to large businesses seeking cross-browser and cross-device testing.

  • Particularly well-suited for e-commerce and software/IT companies.

  • Best for small to large businesses (1-1000+ employees), particularly e-commerce and software companies.

  • Ideal for software, IT, telecommunications, e-commerce, retail, and related industries.

BrowserStack and LambdaTest features

Supported
Partially supported
Not supported
Type in the name of the feature or in your own words tell us what you need

  • Cross-browser and cross-device testing
    Supported

    BrowserStack supports cross-browser and cross-device testing for web and apps.

    Supported

    LambdaTest supports cross-browser and cross-device testing for web and app automation.

  • Cypress Testing
    Supported

    BrowserStack fully supports running Cypress tests at scale.

    Supported

    LambdaTest fully supports Cypress testing at scale with parallel execution and broad browser coverage.

  • Appium Testing
    Supported

    BrowserStack supports Appium testing on its mobile testing cloud.

    Supported

    LambdaTest supports Appium testing on a scalable and secure real device cloud.

  • Live app testing
    Supported

    BrowserStack supports live app testing on real devices.

    Supported

    LambdaTest supports live app testing on real devices and emulators.

  • Legacy browser
    Supported

    BrowserStack supports testing on older browser versions, including all versions of Internet Explorer.

    Supported

    LambdaTest supports testing on older and legacy browser versions.

  • Device comparison
    Supported

    BrowserStack allows comparing app/webpage appearance across two devices simultaneously.

    Supported

    LambdaTest supports comparing app/webpage appearance across devices.

Qualities

  • Value and Pricing Transparency
    -0.4
    Rather negative sentiment
    -0.27
    Neutral sentiment
  • Customer Service
    +0.58
    Rather positive sentiment
    +0.71
    Strongly positive sentiment
  • Ease of Use
    +0.81
    Strongly positive sentiment
    +0.82
    Strongly positive sentiment
  • Reliability and Performance
    +0.07
    Neutral sentiment
    +0.24
    Neutral sentiment
  • Ease of Implementation
    +0.66
    Rather positive sentiment
    +0.44
    Rather positive sentiment
  • Scalability
    +0.87
    Strongly positive sentiment
    +0.79
    Strongly positive sentiment

BrowserStack and LambdaTest Pricing

BrowserStack offers various subscription plans for different testing needs. All plans include local testing, native browser behavior, team management, uncompromising security, 3000+ real desktop browsers, a range of display resolutions, pre-installed developer tools, and expert tech support & documentation. BrowserStack also offers a freelancer plan with limited minutes and a free open-source plan.
Plans

User sentiment

Rather negative
-0.4

See full Pricing page

LambdaTest offers a freemium plan and several paid plans for different testing needs. All plans include access to 3000+ browsers and operating systems, as well as 24/7 support. Paid plans offer unlimited testing time for live, screenshot, and responsive testing, while the free plan has limited usage. The higher-tier plans provide additional features such as real mobile devices, advanced support options, and enhanced security and compliance features.
Plans

User sentiment

Neutral
-0.27

See full Pricing page

BrowserStack and LambdaTest review insights

3381 reviews analysed from and

Users love

  • Wide range of devices and browsers available.
  • Easy to use and implement.
  • Helpful for identifying platform-specific bugs.
  • Local testing feature is useful.
  • Good customer support.
  • Wide range of real devices and browsers for testing.
  • Real-time testing and debugging capabilities.
  • Integration with popular CI/CD tools.
  • Automated screenshot testing.
  • Helpful and responsive customer support.

Users dislike

  • Slow performance on some devices.
  • Accessibility testing is behind a paywall.
  • Expensive, especially for features like Percy.
  • Difficult to test with local network/VPN.
  • Occasional lags when interacting with some virtual devices.
  • Some UI discrepancies compared to real devices.
  • Initial setup of tunnel can be confusing.
  • Mobile app occasionally crashes or restarts during testing.
  • Limited free tier usage.

BrowserStack and LambdaTest Ratings

  • G2
    4.5/5
    (1599)
  • Capterra
    4.5/5
    (210)
  • Glassdoor
    4.2/5
    (685)
  • G2
    4.5/5
    (1320)
  • Capterra
    4.6/5
    (252)
  • Glassdoor
    4.5/5
    (299)

Company health

Employee growth

28% increase in the last year
14% increase in the last year

Web traffic

5% increase in the last quarter
17% decrease in the last quarter

Financing

January 2021 - $250M
August 2024 - $108M

How do BrowserStack and LambdaTest compare regarding mobile app testing stability?

Both BrowserStack and LambdaTest offer mobile app testing on real devices, but user reviews suggest that each platform has its own stability challenges. BrowserStack users report slow performance on some devices, while LambdaTest users mention occasional lags with virtual devices and occasional app crashes or restarts during testing on real devices. Therefore, neither platform appears to have a definitive advantage in stability for mobile app testing based on available information. Direct trials and comparisons are recommended to determine which platform offers better stability for a specific use case.

Which platform, BrowserStack or LambdaTest, offers easier initial setup and configuration?

Both platforms offer relatively easy setup, but BrowserStack's perceived simplicity and broader popularity might give it a slight edge for initial setup and configuration, especially for users less familiar with cross-browser testing tools. LambdaTest's tunnel setup has been noted as potentially confusing by some users.

What are the advantages of BrowserStack?

BrowserStack has a larger market presence indicated by significantly higher website traffic growth and LinkedIn employee growth. User reviews highlight BrowserStack's ease of use and implementation, along with its comprehensive range of devices and browsers. While both products offer similar core features, BrowserStack is favored for its support of legacy browsers and a robust local testing feature.

What are the disadvantages of BrowserStack?

BrowserStack can be expensive, especially for advanced features like Percy, and users have reported slow performance on some devices. Additionally, accessibility testing requires an additional cost, and some users find it difficult to test with local networks or VPNs.

Alternatives to BrowserStack and LambdaTest

Logo of Applitools
Applitools
Automated visual testing catches UI bugs you wouldn't believe.
Read more
Logo of Browserling
Browserling
Test websites across browsers for compatibility and responsiveness.
Read more
Logo of LoadNinja
LoadNinja
Fast, easy website load testing with real browsers, not simulations.
Read more
Logo of Perfecto
browserstack vs Perfecto
Cloud-based app testing for web and mobile, ensuring flawless user experiences.
Read more
Logo of Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector
Automated website testing, catching bugs before users do.
Read more
Logo of TestComplete
TestComplete
Automated UI testing, simplified. Scales effortlessly, boosts software quality.
Read more
Page co-authored by
MK
Michal Kaczor
CEO at Gralio

Michal has worked at startups for many years and writes about topics relating to software selection and IT management. As a former consultant for Bain, a business advisory company, he also knows how to understand needs of any business and find solutions to its problems.

TT
Tymon Terlikiewicz
CTO at Gralio

Tymon is a seasoned CTO who loves finding the perfect tools for any task. He recently headed up the tech department at Batmaid, a well-known Swiss company, where he managed about 60 software purchases, including CX, HR, Payroll, Marketing automation and various developer tools.

How are we doing?

Is this information helpful to you? Is there anything we are missing?
Did this help you select your product?
Other issues? Vote & Let us know
NEW: Introducing Gralio Screen Buddy

An AI tool that observes your work, finds inefficiencies, and suggests smarter ways to do things. Maybe you can use your tools better, automate tasks, or switch software.

For Individuals
Streamline your daily tasks, get helpful AI tips, and find the right tools for your workflow.
For Businesses
See how your team really works, uncover automation opportunities, and get software recommendations tailored to your processes.