Groundcover is a cloud-based application monitoring tool designed for modern development and IT operations teams. It provides a comprehensive view of your cloud infrastructure and application performance in one place. Groundcover uses a technology called eBPF to automatically collect data, minimizing setup time. It's designed to be cost-effective and scalable, offering a flat pricing model regardless of data volume. Groundcover prioritizes data security by keeping all information within your own cloud environment.
Who is groundcover best for
Groundcover is a cloud-based application monitoring tool ideal for DevOps teams at startups and SMBs using Kubernetes and cloud infrastructure. It offers real-time monitoring, application performance monitoring, and robust support for cloud environments, especially AWS EKS. Users praise its ease of use, comprehensive observability, and predictable pricing. While some users mention limitations in eBPF integrations and data analysis, Groundcover's simple setup and focus on cloud-native applications make it a strong choice for modern development teams.
Ideal for startups and SMBs leveraging Kubernetes and cloud infrastructure.
Best fit for software, IT, and telecommunications companies.
groundcover features
Type in the name of the feature or in your own words tell us what you need
Supported
Groundcover supports monitoring cloud applications, especially on AWS EKS.
Supported
Groundcover supports real-time application and server performance monitoring using eBPF technology.
Supported
Groundcover supports deploying and managing containerized applications on Kubernetes clusters.
Supported
Groundcover supports application performance monitoring, including response time, error rate, and throughput monitoring.
Qualities
We evaluate the sentiment that users express about non-functional aspects of the
software
Value and Pricing Transparency
Strongly positive
+1
Customer Service
Strongly positive
+1
Ease of Use
Strongly positive
+0.91
Reliability and Performance
Strongly positive
+1
Ease of Implementation
Strongly positive
+0.87
Scalability
Rather positive
+0.33
groundcover reviews
We've summarised 24 groundcover reviews (groundcover Capterra reviews and groundcover G2 reviews) and
summarised the main points below.
Pros of groundcover
Easy to implement and use, especially within EKS.
Comprehensive observability platform with logs, metrics, and dashboards.
Great pricing model, simple and predictable.
Excellent and responsive Slack community and tech team support.
Keeps all data within the user's own cloud environment for enhanced security.
Cons of groundcover
Limited eBPF integrations for certain technologies like MSSQL.
Navigation through distributed traces could be improved.
Limited options for slicing and dicing data.
Needs more dashboard templates.
groundcover pricing
The commentary is based on 11 reviews from groundcover Capterra reviews and groundcover G2 reviews.
Groundcover's pricing is consistently praised as simple, great, reasonable, and predictable. Users highlight the excellent cost-benefit ratio, particularly for startups and small teams seeking affordable observability solutions. The free plan is also considered valuable for thorough evaluations.
One Kubernetes cluster limit, up to 3 users, support in Slack community.
Team
$20 per node, per month
Unlimited clusters, unlimited users, premium support, up to 100 nodes.
Enterprise
$30 per node, per month
SSO, RBAC, unlimited nodes, access to inCloud Managed, cold storage using S3, multi-cluster view, personal onboarding.
On-premises Solutions
Custom
onPrem setup options, airGapped setup options
groundcover alternatives
Levitate
Better fit for users dealing with high volumes of data. Has significantly more momentum based on website traffic growth. A Levitate alternative for simpler Kubernetes and cloud-native monitoring.
More focused on data observability and quality. Has slower momentum. Negative pricing sentiment with no pricing details available. Rated 4.5/5 from 214 reviews on G2. Users report UI confusion, alert fatigue, and false positives.
Better for enterprise users with complex IT environments. More widely adopted in various industries like healthcare, finance, retail, and manufacturing. A Splunk Platform alternative for those prioritizing cost-effectiveness and simpler setup.
Better fit for users already invested in the Google Cloud ecosystem. More established, with potentially more robust scalability and reliability. Offers pre-built dashboard templates, unlike groundcover. However, initial setup can be complex, and pricing is considered less favorable.
Open-source, providing cost savings compared to groundcover. Has significantly more momentum in terms of employee growth. A groundcover competitor and alternative for cloud application and infrastructure monitoring.
Better for users seeking broad data analysis capabilities, including log management, search, and visualization. Elastic Stack has wider industry applicability and established user base, but is more complex and resource-intensive. It is growing slower than groundcover.
Groundcover is a cloud-based application monitoring tool for modern development and IT operations teams. It provides a comprehensive view of cloud infrastructure and application performance using eBPF technology for automated data collection. Groundcover offers cost-effective, scalable monitoring, prioritizing data security by keeping information within your cloud environment.
How does groundcover integrate with other tools?
How does groundcover integrate with other tools?
Groundcover integrates seamlessly with your cloud environment, especially AWS EKS and Kubernetes clusters. It leverages eBPF technology for automatic data collection and real-time monitoring. While it excels within the EKS ecosystem, some users note limitations with certain technologies like MSSQL.
What the main competitors of groundcover?
What the main competitors of groundcover?
Groundcover competes with observability and application performance monitoring (APM) tools. Alternatives include Monte Carlo, Levitate, and the Elastic Stack. Similar tools offering data quality monitoring are Metaplane and Freshservice. While not directly competing, Domotz offers network monitoring capabilities.
Is groundcover legit?
Is groundcover legit?
Groundcover appears legitimate. User reviews praise its ease of use, comprehensive features, and transparent pricing. It prioritizes data security, keeping information within your cloud environment, which enhances its safety for users. However, consider potential limitations regarding eBPF integrations and data analysis options.
How much does groundcover cost?
How much does groundcover cost?
Groundcover's pricing includes a free plan for individual use. Team plans are $20 per node/month, while Enterprise plans are $30 per node/month. On-premises solutions offer custom pricing. Is Groundcover worth it? The free plan makes it easy to find out.
Is groundcover customer service good?
Is groundcover customer service good?
Groundcover's customer service receives positive feedback, with users highlighting the responsive and helpful support team, especially through their Slack community. Users appreciate the team's willingness to go above and beyond, offering advice and best practices.
Reviewed by
MK
Michal Kaczor
CEO at Gralio
Michal has worked at startups for many years and writes about topics relating to software selection and IT
management. As a former consultant for Bain, a business advisory company, he also knows how to understand needs
of any business and find solutions to its problems.
TT
Tymon Terlikiewicz
CTO at Gralio
Tymon is a seasoned CTO who loves finding the perfect tools for any task. He recently headed up the tech
department at Batmaid, a well-known Swiss company, where he managed about 60 software purchases, including CX,
HR, Payroll, Marketing automation and various developer tools.