Travis CI vs Jenkins
Travis CI is a cloud-based CI/CD platform known for its ease of use and tight GitHub integration, suitable for teams wanting a managed solution with quick setup. Jenkins is a highly flexible, self-hosted open-source server offering extensive customization via plugins, ideal for teams needing control and broad integration capabilities, but requires more management effort.
At Gralio.ai we help to simplify your decision-making process by offering detailed, side-by-side software comparisons like this one, to help you confidently choose the tool that aligns with your business goals.
This comparison was created by analysing 1272 reviews and 60 websites, saving 7 hours, 34 minutes of reading.
About
About
Summary
Summary
Relative strengths of Travis CI (compared to Jenkins)
-
* **Simpler Setup and Configuration:** Travis CI uses a straightforward YAML file for configuration and manages the underlying infrastructure, making it easier to get started compared to setting up and configuring a self-hosted Jenkins server.
-
* **Strong GitHub Integration:** Travis CI offers exceptionally smooth, built-in integration with GitHub, automatically handling pull requests and status checks with minimal setup, often simpler than configuring Jenkins plugins for similar functionality.
-
* **Managed Cloud Service:** As a SaaS platform, Travis CI eliminates the need for users to manage build servers, updates, and scaling, reducing operational overhead compared to the self-managed nature of Jenkins.
Relative weaknesses of Travis CI (compared to Jenkins)
-
* **Less Customization and Fewer Integrations:** Jenkins boasts a vast plugin ecosystem allowing integration with almost any tool and deep customization of workflows, whereas Travis CI offers more limited options for extensibility.
-
* **Reported Reliability and Support Concerns:** Users report issues with Travis CI build stability, speed, and customer support responsiveness, while Jenkins' reliability depends on user management and benefits from strong community support.
-
* **Limited Control and Configuration Flexibility:** Being a hosted service, Travis CI offers less control over the build environment and specific configurations compared to the complete control users have with a self-hosted Jenkins instance.
What companies are using Travis CI and Jenkins?
What companies are using Travis CI and Jenkins?
Who should use Travis CI VS. Jenkins
Who should use Travis CI VS. Jenkins
Travis CI is a cloud platform designed to help software teams automate testing and deployment. We find it's particularly popular with teams using GitHub, who appreciate its easy setup for CI/CD pipelines. Based on reviews, users value how it simplifies catching errors early and speeds up releases, supporting numerous languages and cloud environments. It seems like a solid choice for streamlining development workflows a developer might need a tool for catching errors earlier in the development process or for simplifying the CI/CD workflow setup process for automating builds and deployments of their code
Jenkins is a go-to for development teams wanting to automate software building, testing, and deployment. We find its massive plugin library makes it super flexible for different tools and workflows. While users love the customization and automation power, some find the initial setup tricky and the interface a bit dated. Still, it's a powerful, free option, especially if you need lots of integrations for your CI/CD process
-
In our experience, Travis CI works well for medium-sized businesses and is an excellent fit for larger enterprises looking to automate builds.
-
We see Travis CI primarily used by companies within the Software, IT, and Telecommunications sectors, aligning well with its technical focus.
-
In our experience, Jenkins is a solid choice for software development teams across the board, from small startups to large enterprises.
-
We find Jenkins particularly shines in the Software, IT, and Telecommunications sectors, where automating development pipelines is key.
Travis CI and Jenkins features
Supported Partially supported Not supported Type in the name of the feature or in your own words tell us what you need
Travis CI and Jenkins features
- Language SupportSupported
Travis CI supports a wide range of languages including Ruby, Python, JavaScript, Java, and C++ making it versatile.
SupportedJenkins supports many languages, including Ruby, Python, Java, and likely C++ and JavaScript via plugins.
- Simple CI/CD pipelinesSupported
Travis CI uses .travis.yml for build configurations, supporting quick test and deployment definitions. It scales pipelines with parallel and matrix builds, offering a precise syntax for developers.
SupportedJenkins supports defining and scaling CI/CD pipelines with a developer-friendly syntax.
- Automated CI/CD pipelinesSupported
Travis CI offers automated CI/CD pipelines, including build, test, and configurable deployment stages.
SupportedJenkins excels at automating CI/CD pipelines, using tools to streamline building, testing, and deployment.
- Automated testingSupported
Travis CI supports automated testing, a core feature, by automatically building and testing code changes.
SupportedJenkins fully supports running automated tests within CI/CD pipelines.
- Kubernetes integrationPartially supported
Travis CI supports Kubernetes integration through custom scripts, enabling users to build, push images, and deploy to Kubernetes clusters. Native integration is not available.
SupportedJenkins supports Kubernetes integration for efficient CI/CD processes.
- Pipeline configurationSupported
Travis CI allows defining custom CI/CD pipelines using .travis.yml configuration file.
SupportedJenkins users can create custom CI/CD pipelines using Jenkinsfile which describes pipeline steps.
Qualities
Qualities
- Value and Pricing TransparencyNo data+0.33Rather positive sentiment
- Ease of UseNo data-0.07Neutral sentiment
- Reliability and PerformanceNo data+0.7Strongly positive sentiment
- Ease of ImplementationNo data-0.47Rather negative sentiment
- ScalabilityNo data+0.69Rather positive sentiment
Travis CI and Jenkins Pricing
See full Pricing page
User sentiment
Travis CI and Jenkins review insights
1272 reviews analysed from and
Travis CI and Jenkins review insights
Users love
- Easy integration with GitHub; streamlines automation of builds and deployments.
- Good support for a variety of languages and cloud platforms (AWS, Heroku, etc.)
- Clear and concise build error messages aid quick issue resolution.
- Simplified CI workflow setup.
- The ability to automate the entire process of building, testing, and deploying software
- It can be easily connected to a GitHub repository, making it easy to automate builds and deployments and guarantee the quality of the code with tests.
- Travis CI mainly helps us quickly build and deploy applications without the overhead to maintain build servers and agents.
- I like the ease to setup the CI for automating the deployments in the different applications
- Excellent cloud-based solution for CI/CD without having to self manage the build server and build agent
- Extensive plugin ecosystem allows for integration with a wide range of tools and technologies.
- Highly customizable and adaptable to various development environments and workflows.
- Automates the entire software development lifecycle, including building, testing, and deployment.
- Strong community support and extensive documentation make it easier to find solutions.
Users dislike
- Frequent builds stuck or slow, causing delays.
- Customer service is often slow, unhelpful, or non-responsive.
- Confusing pricing, especially after the move to .com; OSS credits are unreliable.
- Difficult to debug builds without access to a live SSH terminal.
- Limited customization options compared to Jenkins.
- Not so reliable service with constant downtimes for many months.
- Setting up auto deploy is hard; takes more than 20 attempts to deploy sometimes.
- Travis broke their promise of supporting Open Source with free CI service.
- Has no support for nested virtualization.
- Not as extensible and customizable because of its limited plugins.
- The UI has not evolved for years.
- For users who start trial credits end quite fast above all if they use macOS servers
- Initial setup can be complex and time-consuming, especially for large-scale projects.
- The user interface feels outdated and can be cumbersome to navigate at times.
- Managing and updating a large number of plugins can be cumbersome.
- Some plugins are outdated or poorly maintained, leading to compatibility issues.
Travis CI and Jenkins Ratings
Travis CI and Jenkins Ratings
G24.5/5(92)
Capterra4.1/5(129)
- G24.4/5(496)
- Capterra4.5/5(555)
Company health
Company health
Employee growth
Web traffic
Financing
How do Travis CI's limited customization options compare to Jenkins' extensibility?
Which product offers better support and responsiveness for troubleshooting builds?
What are the advantages of Travis CI?
What are the disadvantages of Travis CI?
Alternatives to Travis CI and Jenkins
Michal has worked at startups for many years and writes about topics relating to software selection and IT management. As a former consultant for Bain, a business advisory company, he also knows how to understand needs of any business and find solutions to its problems.
Tymon is a seasoned CTO who loves finding the perfect tools for any task. He recently headed up the tech department at Batmaid, a well-known Swiss company, where he managed about 60 software purchases, including CX, HR, Payroll, Marketing automation and various developer tools.
How are we doing?
An AI tool that observes your work, finds inefficiencies, and suggests smarter ways to do things. Maybe you can use your tools better, automate tasks, or switch software.