Microsoft Security vs Security
Microsoft Security and Security both aim to protect businesses from cyber threats. Microsoft Security provides a more comprehensive set of integrated tools, especially beneficial for companies heavily reliant on the Microsoft ecosystem. Security offers a slightly more streamlined approach, potentially easier to manage for smaller IT teams.
At Gralio.ai we help to simplify your decision-making process by offering detailed, side-by-side software comparisons like this one, to help you confidently choose the tool that aligns with your business goals.
This comparison was created by analysing 864 reviews and 60 websites, saving 5 hours, 18 minutes of reading.
About
Summary
Relative strengths of Microsoft Security (compared to Security)
-
OneDrive integration for enhanced data protection (ransomware detection, data encryption).
-
Broader suite of integrated security tools covering threat detection, data protection, and identity and access management.
-
Specific features like automated incident investigation and response, centralized management via Microsoft 365 Defender portal, and recurring vulnerability checks.
Relative weaknesses of Microsoft Security (compared to Security)
-
More complex licensing model and potentially higher cost.
-
Can be resource-intensive, especially on older devices.
-
Limited multi-cloud support, primarily focused on Azure.
Who should use Microsoft Security VS. Security
Microsoft Security is a comprehensive suite of security tools ideal for businesses of all sizes using Microsoft products. Users appreciate the real-time threat detection, centralized management, and integration with other Microsoft services. However, some find the system complex and expensive, with occasional false positives. It offers robust protection against evolving cyber threats but requires careful configuration to minimize complexity.
Microsoft Security offers comprehensive protection against evolving cyberthreats. It provides a unified platform for managing device, identity, app, and data security. Users praise its real-time threat detection and user-friendly interface, while some find the licensing complex and resource-intensive. It’s ideal for businesses of all sizes seeking robust, integrated security solutions.
-
Ideal for small, medium, and large enterprises, especially those deeply integrated with the Microsoft ecosystem.
-
A strong fit for industries like IT, finance, manufacturing, and the public sector, offering robust security solutions.
-
Ideal for small, medium, and enterprise businesses.
-
Suitable for businesses across various industries.
Microsoft Security and Security features
- Threat detectionSupported
Microsoft Security offers real-time threat detection across various platforms.
SupportedMicrosoft Security offers real-time threat detection and alerts.
- SharePoint integrationNot supported
Microsoft Security does not directly integrate with SharePoint for document management automation.
UnknownSharePoint offers robust security features and integrations, but specific details about "Security" are missing.
- OneDrive integrationSupported
OneDrive integrates with Microsoft Security features like ransomware detection and data encryption.
Partially supportedOneDrive might be integrated with Security via the Microsoft ecosystem.
- Incident responseSupported
Microsoft Security offers incident response services to handle security incidents effectively.
SupportedMicrosoft provides tools and services for timely and effective incident response.
- AuthenticationSupported
Microsoft Security supports multi-factor authentication (MFA) through services like Microsoft Entra and Microsoft 365.
SupportedMicrosoft Entra ID supports multi-factor authentication (MFA) for secure logins.
- Microsoft Teams integrationPartially supported
Microsoft Security integrates with Microsoft Teams for notifications and communication via several tools and features.
SupportedSecurity tools can integrate with Microsoft Teams for notifications and automation.
Qualities
- Value and Pricing Transparency-0.63Rather negative sentiment-0.48Rather negative sentiment
- Customer Service+0.57Rather positive sentiment+0.46Rather positive sentiment
- Ease of Use+0.62Rather positive sentiment+0.54Rather positive sentiment
- Reliability and Performance+0.51Rather positive sentiment+0.55Rather positive sentiment
- Ease of Implementation+0.04Neutral sentiment+0.01Neutral sentiment
- Scalability+0.47Rather positive sentiment+0.51Rather positive sentiment
User sentiment
User sentiment
Microsoft Security and Security review insights
Users love
- Real-time alerts for unauthorized access.
- User-friendly interface.
- Protects sensitive information.
- Excellent endpoint protection with machine learning and behavioral analytics.
- Automated incident investigation and response.
- Centralized management via Microsoft 365 Defender portal.
- Easy software deployment.
- Robust protection against phishing and malware (Office 365).
- Centralized data management (Purview).
- Streamlined identity management (Entra ID).
- Good integration with other Microsoft services.
- Automated security recommendations (Defender for Cloud).
- Recurring vulnerability checks.
- Centralized management of Azure Firewalls (Firewall Manager).
- Enhanced network security.
- Automated assessment scans.
- Multi-factor authentication.
- Vulnerability management.
- Monthly security report summary.
- Real-time threat detection and alerts for unauthorized access.
- User-friendly interface.
- Easy to implement.
- Protects applications and provides alerts for sensitive information.
- Combines machine learning, behavioral analytics, and cloud-based security intelligence.
- Seamlessly integrates with Windows and Mac.
- Automated threat investigation and incident response.
- Centralized management via Microsoft 365 Defender portal.
- Robust protection against phishing and malware.
- Integrates with other Microsoft security solutions.
- Scalability and seamless integration with Microsoft products.
- Threat detection and response using AI and machine learning.
- Automated correlation rules reduce false positives.
- Pay-as-you-use model.
- Real-time threat detection for workloads and containers.
- Automated security recommendations.
- Simplified cloud management.
- Enhanced network security and data loss prevention.
- Recurring vulnerability checks and automated report generation.
- Advanced multi-factor authentication.
- Extensive monitoring features and vulnerability assessments.
Users dislike
- Alert system can be unreliable with false positives.
- Complex licensing model can be confusing.
- Resource intensive, especially on older devices.
- Slow data syncing for software deployment.
- Complex pricing can be expensive.
- Limited multi-cloud support (especially non-Azure platforms).
- Initial setup can be complicated.
- Overload of alerts, often with false positives.
- HIPAA policy setup is complex and time-consuming.
- Limited customization and integration with non-Microsoft products.
- Internet connectivity is required.
- Can block applications unnecessarily.
- Downtimes can occur.
- Email protection needs improvement (phishing, sender blocking).
- Limited control over system patches.
- False positives can occur (Defender for Endpoint, Defender for Cloud Apps, XDR).
- UI can be complex and overwhelming (Sentinel, XDR).
- Logs ingestion can be complicated and expensive (Sentinel).
- Query speed can be slow (Sentinel).
- Complex licensing model can be confusing.
- Resource intensive on older devices, causing performance degradation during scans.
- Complex pricing can be expensive.
- Overload of alerts, often leading to false positives.
- Multi-cloud support is not robust for non-Azure platforms.
- Initial setup can be complicated.
- Reporting features could be more user-friendly.
- Limited customization options.
- Alert system sometimes malfunctions.
- Integration challenges with non-Microsoft tools.
- Very costly, especially for non-on-premise setups.
- Little confusing management, like file/process exceptions.
- Blocks certain applications that shouldn't be blocked.
- Downtimes occur.
- Slow real-time data.
- Email protection needs improvement, especially phishing identification and blocking.
- Limited functionality on older devices.
- Difficult for beginners and lacks clear setup instructions
Microsoft Security and Security Ratings
G24.5/5(432)
- G24.4/5(432)
Company health
Employee growth
Web traffic
Financing
How does Microsoft Security's OneDrive integration impact data protection?
Which product offers simpler setup and ongoing management?
What are the advantages of Microsoft Security?
What are the disadvantages of Microsoft Security?
Alternatives to Microsoft Security and Security
Michal has worked at startups for many years and writes about topics relating to software selection and IT management. As a former consultant for Bain, a business advisory company, he also knows how to understand needs of any business and find solutions to its problems.
Tymon is a seasoned CTO who loves finding the perfect tools for any task. He recently headed up the tech department at Batmaid, a well-known Swiss company, where he managed about 60 software purchases, including CX, HR, Payroll, Marketing automation and various developer tools.
How are we doing?