Microsoft Project Server and Basecamp offer distinct approaches to project management. Project Server provides comprehensive features for enterprise-level projects, while Basecamp focuses on simplicity and ease of use for smaller teams.
At Gralio.ai we help to simplify your decision-making process by offering detailed, side-by-side
software comparisons like this one, to help you confidently choose the tool that aligns with your
business goals.
This comparison was created by analysing 5086 reviews and 60
websites, saving 1 day, 4 hours, 45 minutes of reading.
Microsoft Project Server
Basecamp
About
Microsoft Project Server is a comprehensive project management tool designed for larger companies. It helps you manage and prioritize all your projects in one place, from initial planning to execution. With Project Server, your team can collaborate on projects, track progress, and make informed decisions from any location. It requires SharePoint 2013 to function.
Basecamp is a software application designed to simplify teamwork and communication within organizations of all sizes. It offers a centralized platform for managing projects, assigning tasks, sharing documents, scheduling deadlines, and engaging in real-time discussions, all in one place. Basecamp aims to streamline workflows, enhance team collaboration, and reduce reliance on lengthy meetings and email threads. Its straightforward design promotes clarity and ease of use.
Summary
Main difference
Microsoft Project Server is a powerful project management tool best suited for larger enterprises needing robust resource management and integration with the Microsoft ecosystem. Basecamp is a simpler, more user-friendly platform ideal for smaller to mid-sized businesses prioritizing ease of use and streamlined communication.
Relative strengths of Microsoft Project Server (compared to Basecamp)
Strong resource management capabilities
Seamless integration with Microsoft Project and SharePoint
Robust project portfolio management features
Relative weaknesses of Microsoft Project Server (compared to Basecamp)
Less user-friendly than Basecamp
More expensive than Basecamp
Requires SharePoint 2013
Who should use Microsoft Project Server VS. Basecamp
Microsoft Project Server is a comprehensive project management solution designed for larger organizations to manage projects from start to finish. It centralizes project planning, execution, and collaboration, enabling teams to track progress and make data-driven decisions. Requires SharePoint 2013.
Basecamp helps teams centralize projects, tasks, files, and communication. Users praise its consolidated to-do lists and real-time updates. However, some users mention the lack of time-tracking and advanced reporting features. Ideal for remote or complex project teams.
Best for medium to large businesses seeking robust project management.
Ideal for Manufacturing, Consumer Goods, Software/IT, Education, Energy, Marketing, and Professional Services.
Best for small to medium-sized businesses needing streamlined communication and task management.
A good fit for various sectors, including Healthcare, Finance, and E-commerce.
Microsoft Project Server and Basecamp features
Supported
Partially supported
Not supported
Type in the name of the feature or in your own words tell us what you need
Message Board
Not supported
Microsoft Project Server does not appear to have a built-in message board feature.
Supported
Basecamp offers a centralized message board for focused discussions, replacing scattered email threads.
Resource Management
Supported
Project Server supports flexible resource planning and allocation with features like centralized resource pools and visual analytics.
Not supported
Basecamp does not support flexible resource planning and allocation.
Project portfolio management
Supported
Project Server supports project portfolio management, including analysis, prioritization, and resource allocation.
Not supported
Basecamp is not suitable for managing large project portfolios.
Client portals
Partially supported
Client portals are not directly supported, but can be created through integration with other Microsoft tools.
Supported
Basecamp provides dedicated client portals for accessing project information and collaborating.
Project Management Platform Integration
Not supported
Project Server integrates with other Microsoft products, but not directly with Asana, Trello, or Jira.
Partially supported
Basecamp integrates with platforms like Asana, Trello, or Jira via third party apps.
Collaboration features
Partially supported
Project Server supports collaboration via integration with SharePoint, enabling features like file sharing.
Supported
Basecamp provides features for commenting on tasks and sharing files.
Browse all features
Qualities
Value and Pricing Transparency
-1
Strongly negative sentiment
-0.17
Neutral sentiment
Customer Service
No data
-0.14
Neutral sentiment
Ease of Use
+0.78
Strongly positive sentiment
+0.83
Strongly positive sentiment
Reliability and Performance
+0.25
Neutral sentiment
+0.5
Rather positive sentiment
Ease of Implementation
+0
Neutral sentiment
+0.57
Rather positive sentiment
Scalability
+0
Neutral sentiment
-0.67
Rather negative sentiment
Microsoft Project Server and Basecamp Pricing
No data
User sentiment
Strongly negative
-1
We couldn't find a pricing page for Microsoft Project Server.
No data
User sentiment
Neutral
-0.17
We couldn't find a pricing page for Basecamp.
Microsoft Project Server and Basecamp review insights
5086 reviews analysed from
and
Users love
Excellent for managing complex projects and portfolios.
Robust resource allocation and capacity planning features.
Seamless integration with other Microsoft products, especially SharePoint and Excel.
Detailed reporting and analysis capabilities.
Facilitates team collaboration and communication.
Like that you can create and be a part of many different projects and the system will consolidate all of your to-dos.
The notification feature is great to keep updates in real time.
Ability to copy and paste projects so you can use the steps/to-dos created today for the next time you do the project.
Ease of Use
Users dislike
High cost and licensing fees are a common concern.
Steep learning curve for new users and complex features.
Server-based setup can be cumbersome and resource-intensive.
Limited integration with non-Microsoft products.
Web interface can be slow and less user-friendly than the desktop application.
Calendar should be able to sync as it was yours so everything to schedule seems to be done from your google account.
It lacks advanced reporting features, which makes tracking project progress less detailed than I\'d like.
It does not include built-in time tracking.
No Time Tracking.It does not include built-in time tracking.
Microsoft Project Server and Basecamp Ratings
G2
4.1/5
(178)
G2
4.1/5
(2508)
Capterra
4.4/5
(2400)
Company health
Employee growth
3% increase in the last year
5% increase in the last year
Web traffic
11% decrease in the last quarter
16% decrease in the last quarter
Financing
No data
No data
How do Basecamp's client portals compare to Project Server's SharePoint integration?
Basecamp provides client portals designed for easy collaboration and information sharing with clients, while Project Server integrates with SharePoint, offering a more robust and complex solution for document management and collaboration within the organization. Basecamp's client portals are simpler and more focused on external communication, whereas Project Server's SharePoint integration is geared towards internal team collaboration and broader document management across the organization.
Which product better supports resource allocation for large, complex projects?
Microsoft Project Server is better suited for resource allocation in large, complex projects. Its features specifically address resource management needs, including resource pools, capacity planning, and integration with Microsoft Project files for detailed project plans. While Basecamp is a useful tool for team communication and task management, it lacks the robust resource allocation capabilities necessary for the complexities of larger projects.
What are the advantages of Microsoft Project Server?
Microsoft Project Server offers robust project portfolio management capabilities, enabling organizations to prioritize projects and allocate resources effectively across multiple initiatives. Its tight integration with Microsoft Project Professional allows for detailed project planning and tracking, while features like resource pooling and capacity planning facilitate efficient resource management. This makes it particularly advantageous for larger enterprises with complex project needs and a reliance on the Microsoft ecosystem.
What are the disadvantages of Microsoft Project Server?
Microsoft Project Server has a few disadvantages. It relies on SharePoint 2013, which can be a limitation for companies not already using that platform. Its scalability and ease of implementation received low scores, suggesting potential difficulties in deploying and adapting the software. Finally, user reviews are limited compared to competitors, making it harder to gauge real-world experiences.
Alternatives to Microsoft Project Server and Basecamp
CogniSaaS
CogniSaaS is a software platform designed for onboarding new customers and managing projects, particularly for enterprise SaaS companies. It aims to streamline customer projects, improve team collaboration, and provide data-driven insights to optimize project delivery and revenue recognition. CogniSaaS offers features like task management, customer collaboration tools, timesheet tracking, reporting dashboards, and resource management functionalities. Their focus on customer success and industry best practices sets them apart.
monday.com is a customizable work platform designed to streamline workflows and improve team collaboration. It offers a suite of products, including monday work management, monday sales CRM, and monday dev, each tailored to specific team needs. With features like dashboards, automations, and integrations, monday.com enables businesses to manage projects, track progress, and make data-driven decisions. Its flexible and adaptable design caters to various industries and scales as organizations grow.
ClickUp is a comprehensive work management platform designed to consolidate various work processes into one centralized location. It offers a wide array of features including task management, project planning, document collaboration, communication tools, goal setting, and automation options. ClickUp aims to enhance team collaboration, improve visibility across projects, and streamline workflows for increased productivity regardless of team size or industry.
Cora PPM
Cora PPM is a comprehensive project and portfolio management software designed for large enterprises. It helps you plan, prioritize, and execute projects while tracking their financial performance. Cora PPM offers tools for resource management, reporting, and analysis, giving you a clear view of your projects and their impact on your business. Its focus on governance and compliance makes it suitable for regulated industries. Cora PPM promises to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and increase profitability by streamlining project delivery and optimizing resource utilization.
Bordio is a work management software designed to streamline teamwork and boost productivity for teams of all sizes. It provides a central platform for managing tasks, projects, and team communication. With features like task scheduling, workload management, time tracking, and built-in chat, Bordio helps teams stay organized, on track, and efficient. It also offers a mobile app for work on the go and integrates with popular tools like Google Calendar.
Rocketlane is a software platform designed for client-facing teams to manage projects, onboard customers, and automate professional services. It helps businesses streamline their workflows, improve collaboration, and gain better control over projects and resources. Rocketlane aims to enhance project predictability, profitability, and customer satisfaction through a centralized hub for communication, task management, and resource allocation.
How are we doing?
Is this information helpful to you? Is there anything we are missing?