Linear and Jira Core offer distinct approaches to project management. Linear excels in speed and ease of use for software development teams, while Jira Core provides greater flexibility and broader applicability across various project types and industries.
At Gralio.ai we help to simplify your decision-making process by offering detailed, side-by-side
software comparisons like this one, to help you confidently choose the tool that aligns with your
business goals.
This comparison was created by analysing 238 reviews and 60
websites, saving 1 hour, 49 minutes of reading.
Linear
Jira Core
About
Linear is a software platform designed for product development teams of all sizes to manage projects and build products efficiently. It provides tools to streamline and track issues, manage sprints, and build product roadmaps. Linear enables teams to collaborate on ideas, plan projects, visualize progress, and gain insights from real-time data analytics. It integrates with popular tools like Slack and Figma, making it a comprehensive solution for managing modern software development workflows.
Jira Core is project management software designed to help teams organize, track, and manage work. It offers customizable workflows, task assignments, and progress tracking features. Jira Core is suitable for teams of all sizes and industries looking to improve collaboration and project visibility. It helps streamline workflows and increase team efficiency.
Summary
Main difference
Linear is a specialized project management tool built for software development teams, emphasizing speed and a streamlined, intuitive interface. Jira Core is a more general project management platform suitable for various teams and industries, offering broader applicability but potentially a steeper learning curve.
Relative strengths of Linear (compared to Jira Core)
Superior user experience with an intuitive interface and efficient navigation.
Focus on speed and performance, ideal for fast-paced development environments.
Strong integrations with software development tools like Slack and Figma.
Relative weaknesses of Linear (compared to Jira Core)
Less adaptable than Jira Core, not ideal for non-software projects.
Limited customization options compared to Jira Core.
Smaller user community and fewer available integrations than Jira Core.
Who should use Linear VS. Jira Core
Linear is a powerful project management and software development tool praised for its intuitive design, speed, and collaboration features. Users love its clean interface, efficient performance, and helpful keyboard shortcuts, while some desire more label customization. Best for small to mid-sized teams, Linear helps streamline workflows and boost productivity.
Jira Core is project management software ideal for teams who need to streamline workflows and boost collaboration. Users praise its customizable workflows and progress tracking, but some find the UI confusing and search functionality lacking. It's best for small to medium-sized businesses in any industry.
Best for small to mid-sized teams seeking a streamlined, intuitive platform.
Ideal for software development teams looking to enhance collaboration and boost productivity.
Best for small to medium-sized businesses.
Suitable for all industries.
Linear and Jira Core features
Supported
Partially supported
Not supported
Type in the name of the feature or in your own words tell us what you need
Workflow management
Not supported
Linear is designed for software development workflows, not knowledge bases.
Partially supported
Jira Core can be customized to manage knowledge base content workflows, but it is not its primary focus.
Intuitive Interface Design
Supported
Linear has a sleek, minimalist, and streamlined interface praised for intuitive design.
Supported
Jira Core interface is designed for simplicity and ease of use.
High Performance
Supported
Linear is built for speed with a high-performance architecture.
Partially supported
Jira Core might offer some level of performance but it is not explicitly documented.
Purpose-built Workflows
Supported
Linear supports custom workflows designed for software development, enhancing efficiency.
Supported
Jira Core supports customized workflows designed for specific purposes to enhance efficiency.
Team Collaboration Enhancement
Supported
Linear supports team collaboration with features like real-time co-editing and communication tools integration.
Supported
Jira Core offers basic collaboration features like issue tracking and project management.
Comprehensive Product Management
Supported
Linear supports comprehensive product management, from daily tasks to large initiatives.
Not supported
Jira Core handles daily tasks and smaller projects, but not comprehensive product management.
Intuitive and user-friendly interface, praised for its clean design and ease of use.
Fast and efficient performance, making task management seamless.
Excellent keyboard shortcuts and hotkeys, enabling efficient navigation and interaction.
Strong collaboration features, particularly for software development teams.
Easy to track project progress.
Makes collaboration easier.
Customizable workflows.
Great for Agile Product Management.
Users dislike
Limited customization options for labels, with users desiring more flexibility.
The UI can be confusing if not set up well internally.
Search functionality is not very optimized.
Limited file size upload.
Reports are not reusable.
Linear and Jira Core Ratings
G2
4.6/5
(36)
TrustPilot
4.0/5
(4)
G2
4.4/5
(198)
Company health
Employee growth
47% increase in the last year
No data
Web traffic
No change in the last quarter
No data
Financing
June 2023 - $52M
No data
How do Linear's purpose-built workflows compare to Jira Core's for software teams?
Linear's purpose-built workflows are specifically designed for software development teams, offering features like sprint management and issue tracking tailored to their needs. Jira Core, while customizable, has a more general project management focus and may require more configuration to effectively support software development-specific processes. Therefore, Linear provides a more streamlined and efficient out-of-the-box experience for software teams compared to Jira Core's broader approach.
Which product, Linear or Jira Core, offers a more intuitive user experience for project management?
Linear offers a more intuitive user experience for project management. User reviews consistently praise Linear's clean, minimalist interface and ease of use. While Jira Core is a capable tool, its interface is often cited as confusing and requiring significant configuration to be user-friendly.
What are the advantages of Linear?
Linear offers a high-performance, purpose-built platform with an intuitive interface specifically designed for software development teams. Its focus on speed, streamlined workflows, and real-time collaboration makes it highly efficient for managing projects and building products. Users praise its clean design, ease of use, and effective keyboard shortcuts for enhanced productivity.
What are the disadvantages of Linear?
Linear has limited customization options, particularly for labels, which can be a drawback for teams requiring more flexibility in their workflows. It also receives negative sentiment regarding its pricing transparency. Finally, Linear may not be suitable for very large enterprise companies as indicated by the 'bad' suitability rating.
Trello is a visual project management tool that helps teams organize tasks and collaborate more effectively. Using boards, lists, and cards, teams can easily track progress on projects, from simple to-do lists to complex workflows. Trello offers a high level of customization with features like templates, integrations with other popular apps, and no-code automation. Its intuitive interface makes it easy for anyone to use, regardless of technical skill. Trello offers various pricing plans to suit different team sizes and needs, including a free plan for small teams.
CogniSaaS
CogniSaaS is a software platform designed for onboarding new customers and managing projects, particularly for enterprise SaaS companies. It aims to streamline customer projects, improve team collaboration, and provide data-driven insights to optimize project delivery and revenue recognition. CogniSaaS offers features like task management, customer collaboration tools, timesheet tracking, reporting dashboards, and resource management functionalities. Their focus on customer success and industry best practices sets them apart.
Dynatrace helps you understand how your software is running, like a health tracker for your apps and systems. It monitors everything - websites, networks, user experience - to pinpoint problems before they impact your business. With AI-powered analysis, Dynatrace simplifies complex data, giving you clear answers and helping you automate IT tasks.
Jarvis
Jarvis is project management software designed for teams to plan, track, and deliver work. It offers features like task management, time tracking, and reporting tools to help manage projects and improve team collaboration. Jarvis focuses on providing a visual and intuitive platform to simplify complex projects, aiming to increase productivity and transparency.
Jira is a popular work management tool from Atlassian used by teams of all sizes to track tasks and projects. It helps organize, prioritize, and track work progress through customizable workflows, boards, and reporting features. Although highly configurable and initially popular for software development, Jira is now used by various teams for project management, bug tracking, and issue resolution.
Wrike is a versatile work management platform designed to streamline workflows and improve efficiency for teams of all sizes. It centralizes work, providing a single source of truth and offering various views like Gantt charts and Kanban boards. Wrike allows automation of routine tasks, provides real-time insights through dashboards, and facilitates seamless collaboration. It features tools for proofing and approvals, resource management, and integrates with popular business applications. Wrike is a comprehensive solution suitable for various departments, from marketing and IT to operations and product development.
How are we doing?
Is this information helpful to you? Is there anything we are missing?