Edworking vs Confluence

by Gralio Feb 09, 2025

Edworking and Confluence offer distinct approaches to team collaboration. Edworking provides an all-in-one platform with a focus on communication and basic project management, while Confluence emphasizes knowledge sharing and robust documentation features. Edworking is better suited for smaller, remote teams seeking simplicity and affordability, while Confluence caters to larger organizations needing advanced customization and integration options.

At Gralio.ai we help to simplify your decision-making process by offering detailed, side-by-side software comparisons like this one, to help you confidently choose the tool that aligns with your business goals.

This comparison was created by analysing 4985 reviews and 60 websites, saving 1 day, 4 hours, 11 minutes of reading.

Edworking

Website LinkedIn

Confluence

Website LinkedIn Twitter

About

Edworking is an all-in-one work platform designed for teams of all sizes to collaborate and manage projects remotely. It combines communication tools like video conferencing and instant messaging with project management features like task management, file sharing, and document editing. This eliminates the need for multiple software subscriptions by providing a central hub for all work-related activities. Edworking is suitable for teams transitioning to remote work or seeking to streamline their operations from a single, unified platform.

Confluence is a collaborative workspace designed to streamline teamwork and knowledge sharing. It allows you to create, organize, and collaborate on documents, projects, and ideas in one central hub. This eliminates scattered information and keeps everyone on the same page. Confluence integrates with other tools and is highly customizable to adapt to various team needs, from product launches to marketing strategies.

Summary

Main difference

Edworking is a better choice for smaller teams seeking an all-in-one platform for communication and basic project management, especially those transitioning to remote work. Confluence excels at fostering team collaboration and knowledge sharing within larger organizations, particularly those needing robust documentation and integration capabilities.

Relative strengths of Edworking (compared to Confluence)

Stronger focus on real-time communication (video, chat, messaging) compared to Confluence.
Simpler and more intuitive user interface, making it easier for non-technical users to adopt.
More affordable pricing, especially for smaller teams, with a lifetime license option.

Relative weaknesses of Edworking (compared to Confluence)

Lacks the extensive customization and integration options offered by Confluence.
Limited project management features compared to Confluence's more comprehensive capabilities.
Less suitable for larger organizations due to scalability limitations and basic documentation features.

What companies are using Edworking and Confluence?

No data

Who should use Edworking VS. Confluence

Edworking is an all-in-one work platform ideal for remote teams. It combines communication tools with project management features. Users love its intuitive interface, mobile accessibility, and cost-effective pricing, especially the lifetime license option. However, some have noted file size limits and occasional usability issues. It's best for startups, SMEs, and freelancers.

Confluence centralizes team collaboration and knowledge sharing. Users praise its search functionality and ease of documentation management. However, some find the editor basic and search results inconsistent. Best for teams seeking a central hub to create, organize, and collaborate on projects, regardless of industry.

Best for startups, SMEs, and freelancers working remotely.
Ideal for teams in retail, consumer goods, manufacturing, education, real estate, construction, transportation & logistics, media & entertainment, software, IT, telecommunications, energy & utilities, marketing & advertising, and professional services.

Best for small, medium, and large businesses.
Ideal for software, IT, and telecommunications companies, but suitable for most industries.

Edworking and Confluence features

Supported

Partially supported

Not supported

Type in the name of the feature or in your own words tell us what you need

Pages

Not supported

Edworking does not directly offer flexible pages with AI editors, templates, or blogs.

Partially supported

Confluence supports flexible pages, templates, and blogs, but not an AI editor.
Diagrams

Not supported

Diagrams are not supported.

Partially supported

Confluence supports diagrams via integration with draw.io, enabling collaborative editing.
Whiteboards

Not supported

Edworking does not offer integrated whiteboards but may support some visual collaboration through shared documents.

Supported

Confluence supports whiteboards with templates, diagrams, flowcharts, and retrospectives.
Real-time collaboration

Supported

Edworking enables collaborative editing, allowing multiple users to work on the same document at the same time.

Supported

Confluence supports real-time collaboration, allowing multiple users to work together on documents or projects simultaneously.
Content Collaboration

Supported

Edworking supports content collaboration with real-time co-editing and commenting features.

Supported

Confluence allows simultaneous document editing and commenting.
Shared knowledge base

Supported

Edworking supports shared knowledge bases through document management, file sharing, and AI-powered search.

Supported

Confluence supports the ability for teams to store, share, and collaborate on information and resources.

Qualities

Value and Pricing Transparency

+0.71

Strongly positive sentiment

-0.65

Rather negative sentiment
Customer Service

No data

-0.29

Neutral sentiment
Ease of Use

+1

Strongly positive sentiment

+0.69

Rather positive sentiment
Reliability and Performance

+1

Strongly positive sentiment

+0.12

Neutral sentiment
Ease of Implementation

No data

+0.04

Neutral sentiment
Scalability

No data

-0.52

Rather negative sentiment

Edworking and Confluence Pricing

Edworking offers a Free plan and three paid plans - Starter, Unlimited, and Business. The pricing is based on a per-user, per-month model.

Plans

User sentiment

Strongly positive

+0.71

See full Pricing page

No data

User sentiment

Rather negative

-0.65

See full Pricing page

Edworking and Confluence review insights

4984 reviews analysed from and

Users love

All-in-one platform (video, chat, file sharing, project management)
Easy to use and intuitive interface
Mobile app availability (iOS and Android)
Good customer support
Cost-effective pricing (especially lifetime license)

Easy to use, searching and getting instant results
Easy to manage all projects documentation
Great to store crucial documentation and notes
The "children pages" macro is very helpful when building multi-layered playbooks

Users dislike

File size limits for sharing (e.g., 1GB limit)
Paid API access
Occasional usability issues
Lack of customization (colors, branding, icon placement)

The editor is very basic and needs more functionality
Search sometimes doesn’t give accurate results
Difficult to organize documentation as per the required groups
The page tree should be more creative to customize the viewing

Edworking and Confluence Ratings

G2

4.7/5

(24)
Capterra

4.9/5

(18)
TrustPilot

3.7/5

(1)

G2

4.1/5

(2519)
Capterra

4.5/5

(2423)

Company health

Employee growth

No change in the last year

No data

Web traffic

19% increase in the last quarter

No data

Financing

April 2022 - $123K

No data

How do Edworking's all-in-one features compare to Confluence's knowledge management focus for a small marketing team?

For a small marketing team, Edworking's all-in-one approach offers a potentially simpler solution for basic collaboration needs like file sharing and communication, potentially streamlining workflows in a single platform. Confluence, while not offering built-in communication tools, focuses on robust knowledge management, which may be more beneficial for a marketing team dealing with extensive documentation, complex campaigns, and evolving brand guidelines. Confluence's strength lies in its collaborative editing and knowledge base features, which may be more valuable for a marketing team needing detailed documentation and strategic alignment, even if it requires integrating with separate communication tools.

Which product, Edworking or Confluence, better supports real-time collaboration on documents for remote teams?

Confluence is the better choice for real-time document collaboration. While Edworking offers file sharing and in-app messaging, Confluence explicitly highlights real-time collaboration features, allowing multiple users to simultaneously edit and comment on documents within the platform. This focus on real-time co-authoring makes Confluence more suitable for remote teams needing to work together on documents efficiently.

What are the advantages of Edworking?

Edworking's advantages include its all-in-one design combining communication and project management, ease of use, mobile accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, especially with its lifetime license option. This makes it particularly appealing to smaller, remote teams looking to streamline operations and reduce software subscription costs.

What are the disadvantages of Edworking?

Edworking has some limitations regarding file sharing sizes, potentially hindering large file transfers. Users have also noted occasional usability issues and a lack of customization options for branding and interface personalization. Paid API access might be a barrier for those needing integrations. Finally, Edworking might not be suitable for large enterprises due to scalability concerns.

Alternatives to Edworking and Confluence

Basecamp

Basecamp is a software application designed to simplify teamwork and communication within organizations of all sizes. It offers a centralized platform for managing projects, assigning tasks, sharing documents, scheduling deadlines, and engaging in real-time discussions, all in one place. Basecamp aims to streamline workflows, enhance team collaboration, and reduce reliance on lengthy meetings and email threads. Its straightforward design promotes clarity and ease of use.

ClickUp

ClickUp is a comprehensive work management platform designed to consolidate various work processes into one centralized location. It offers a wide array of features including task management, project planning, document collaboration, communication tools, goal setting, and automation options. ClickUp aims to enhance team collaboration, improve visibility across projects, and streamline workflows for increased productivity regardless of team size or industry.

Notion

Notion is an all-in-one workspace platform designed to help teams organize information, manage projects, and collaborate effectively. It centralizes notes, documents, tasks, and databases, making it easy for teams to access and share information. Notion allows users to customize their workspace with templates and integrations and offers AI features for writing assistance and information retrieval. It aims to be a flexible solution that adapts to various work styles and replaces the need for multiple single-purpose tools.

Lark

Lark is an all-in-one platform designed to simplify work for teams. It combines chat, video conferencing, document creation, project management, and more into a single application. This allows teams to streamline their workflows, improve communication, and increase productivity. Lark aims to be a central hub for all work-related activities, accessible from anywhere.

Coda

Coda is a collaborative workspace tool that combines aspects of documents, spreadsheets, and applications. It allows teams to create customized documents with integrated features such as tables, buttons, and automations. Coda aims to centralize information, streamline workflows, and replace multiple single-purpose tools. It's suitable for various teams and tasks like project management, OKR tracking, and creating knowledge bases. Coda is free for individual use with tiered paid plans for teams.

monday.com

monday.com is a customizable work platform designed to streamline workflows and improve team collaboration. It offers a suite of products, including monday work management, monday sales CRM, and monday dev, each tailored to specific team needs. With features like dashboards, automations, and integrations, monday.com enables businesses to manage projects, track progress, and make data-driven decisions. Its flexible and adaptable design caters to various industries and scales as organizations grow.

Page co-authored by

Michal Kaczor

CEO at Gralio

Michal has worked at startups for many years and writes about topics relating to software selection and IT management. As a former consultant for Bain, a business advisory company, he also knows how to understand needs of any business and find solutions to its problems.

Tymon Terlikiewicz

CTO at Gralio

Tymon is a seasoned CTO who loves finding the perfect tools for any task. He recently headed up the tech department at Batmaid, a well-known Swiss company, where he managed about 60 software purchases, including CX, HR, Payroll, Marketing automation and various developer tools.

How are we doing?

Is this information helpful to you? Is there anything we are missing?

Did this help you select your product?

Other issues? Vote & Let us know