Provar and Copado Robotic Testing are both strong contenders for Salesforce test automation. Provar excels in ease of use and comprehensive reporting, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing user experience and detailed test analysis. Copado, however, may be a better fit for larger enterprises needing AI-driven test creation and scalability.
At Gralio.ai we help to simplify your decision-making process by offering detailed, side-by-side
software comparisons like this one, to help you confidently choose the tool that aligns with your
business goals.
This comparison was created by analysing 207 reviews and 60
websites, saving 1 hour, 39 minutes of reading.
Provar is a software testing tool designed specifically for Salesforce. It allows users to build automated tests for their Salesforce applications without needing to write code. This makes it easier for companies to test changes and updates to their Salesforce systems, ensuring that everything is working correctly. Provar is known for its user-friendly interface and its ability to create robust tests that are resistant to breaking when Salesforce is updated.
Copado Robotic Testing helps companies thoroughly test their software, especially on the Salesforce platform. It uses AI to automate the creation of tests, making it faster to ensure software is working correctly. This helps teams release software updates more frequently with fewer errors. It is designed to scale for large projects and integrates smoothly with existing development processes.
Summary
Main difference
Provar stands out with its robust testing capabilities specifically designed for Salesforce, including a user-friendly interface for building code-free tests and detailed reporting features. Copado Robotic Testing, while also Salesforce-focused, emphasizes AI-powered test automation and scalability for larger projects, potentially appealing to enterprises with complex testing needs.
Relative strengths of Provar (compared to Copado Robotic Testing)
Superior Salesforce Integration: Provar offers deeper integration with Salesforce metadata, making tests more resilient to Salesforce updates.
User-Friendly Interface: Provar's no-code approach and intuitive interface make it easier for non-programmers to create and manage tests.
Robust Reporting: Provar provides more comprehensive reporting features than Copado, offering detailed insights into test execution and results.
Relative weaknesses of Provar (compared to Copado Robotic Testing)
Performance Issues: Provar users have reported slow loading times and occasional unresponsiveness, especially with larger projects.
Limited Cross-Platform Compatibility: Provar's focus on Salesforce limits its applicability for testing non-Salesforce applications.
Complex Functionality Learning Curve: While user-friendly for basic tasks, mastering Provar's advanced features may require significant time and effort.
Who should use Provar VS. Copado Robotic Testing
Provar is a user-friendly, no-code testing tool built for Salesforce. It simplifies the process of building automated tests, ensuring updates run smoothly. Users praise its intuitive design and robust testing features, while some note occasional performance issues and a learning curve for advanced functionalities. Perfect for companies of all sizes using Salesforce, Provar helps maintain the quality and efficiency of Salesforce applications.
Copado Robotic Testing helps companies automate software testing, especially for Salesforce. Users praise its ease of use and Salesforce testing capabilities, but some find it slow and limited outside of Salesforce. It's best for small companies heavily reliant on Salesforce, seeking to automate testing to speed up development and improve software quality. Its AI-powered test creation simplifies the process, allowing for more frequent releases with fewer errors.
Best for small, medium, and enterprise companies.
Ideal for businesses using Salesforce across various industries.
Best for small companies.
Ideal for businesses relying on Salesforce.
Provar and Copado Robotic Testing features
Supported
Partially supported
Not supported
Type in the name of the feature or in your own words tell us what you need
Shared steps
Partially supported
Shared steps are not directly supported, but test projects and parameterized test steps can be reused.
Supported
Copado supports reusable test steps through QWords and custom keywords.
Automated testing
Supported
Provar supports automated testing within CI/CD pipelines.
Supported
Copado Robotic Testing automates tests within CI/CD pipelines.
Live app testing
Partially supported
Live app testing is supported via integration with third party platforms like LambdaTest.
Partially supported
Copado Robotic Testing supports live testing for web apps, but mobile app support is unclear.
Salesforce integration
Supported
Provar connects and syncs data with Salesforce CRM for testing purposes.
Partially supported
Copado Robotic Testing integrates with Salesforce for automated testing, but data syncing details are not explicit.
Progress reporting
Supported
Provar supports progress reporting with detailed test execution reports, consolidated results, test cycles, and exportable reports.
Supported
Copado Robotic Testing supports progress tracking with analytics and notifications.
Deployment automation
Not supported
Provar integrates with CI/CD for testing, but does not handle deployments itself.
Not supported
Copado Robotic Testing itself does not handle deployments. Use Copado CI/CD for automated deployments.
Browse all features
Qualities
Value and Pricing Transparency
No data
No data
Customer Service
+0.71
Strongly positive sentiment
No data
Ease of Use
+0.27
Neutral sentiment
+0.63
Rather positive sentiment
Reliability and Performance
-0.56
Rather negative sentiment
-0.43
Rather negative sentiment
Ease of Implementation
+0
Neutral sentiment
+0.83
Strongly positive sentiment
Scalability
No data
-0.33
Rather negative sentiment
Provar and Copado Robotic Testing Pricing
No data
We couldn't find a pricing page for Provar.
No data
User sentiment
Strongly positive
+1
We couldn't find a pricing page for Copado Robotic Testing.
Provar and Copado Robotic Testing review insights
207 reviews analysed from
Users love
Easy setup and customizable to specific business needs.
Intuitive interface and user-friendly for beginners.
Seamless integration with Salesforce and its metadata.
Robust testing capabilities and detailed reporting features.
Excellent customer support, responsive and helpful.
Easy to learn and use, especially for those without coding experience.
Excellent for Salesforce testing.
Live testing and recording features are helpful.
Supports both UI and API testing.
Users dislike
Test Builder can become unresponsive and requires restarting.
Slow loading times and performance issues, especially with larger projects.
Difficulty automating custom components and integrations.
Frequent updates sometimes break existing scripts and require maintenance.
Steep learning curve for complex functionalities and XPath.
Slow performance, especially during live testing.
Integration with non-Salesforce platforms is difficult.
UI could be improved.
Lack of robust reporting/dashboard features.
Provar and Copado Robotic Testing Ratings
G2
4.3/5
(181)
Glassdoor
4.4/5
(53)
G2
4.4/5
(29)
Company health
Employee growth
1% decrease in the last year
No data
Web traffic
116% increase in the last quarter
No data
Financing
October 2020 - $17M
No data
How do Provar and Copado Robotic Testing compare in ease of use for non-coders?
Both Provar and Copado Robotic Testing are designed for ease of use without coding, but Copado scores higher in this specific area (0.63 vs 0.27). User reviews for Copado emphasize its ease of use for non-coders, while Provar users, despite praising its intuitive interface, mention a steeper learning curve for complex functionalities. Therefore, for users with minimal to no coding experience, Copado Robotic Testing might be the more approachable option initially.
Which product best handles complex Salesforce custom component testing?
Provar is better suited for complex Salesforce custom component testing. While Copado is designed for Salesforce and uses AI for test automation, Provar is specifically known for its robust testing capabilities within the Salesforce ecosystem, even though users have reported difficulties with custom components. Copado users report difficulties integrating with non-Salesforce platforms, suggesting Provar's Salesforce-specific focus may provide an advantage for complex Salesforce customizations. Provar's larger user base and more extensive reviews also indicate broader community support and experience with complex scenarios.
What are the advantages of Provar?
Provar offers a no-code approach to Salesforce test automation, making it more accessible to users without coding expertise. It's specifically designed for Salesforce, providing seamless integration and robust tests resistant to breaking during Salesforce updates. User reviews highlight Provar's intuitive interface, easy setup, and strong customer support.
What are the disadvantages of Provar?
Provar users have reported slow loading times and performance issues, especially with larger projects. Some also find the Test Builder can become unresponsive, requiring restarts. Automating custom components and integrations can be difficult, and frequent updates sometimes break existing scripts, necessitating maintenance. Finally, some users have noted a steep learning curve for more complex functionalities and XPath.
Alternatives to Provar and Copado Robotic Testing
ACCELQ
ACCELQ is a cloud-based software testing tool that helps businesses ensure their software is working correctly. It specializes in automating the testing process, meaning less manual work and faster results. What sets ACCELQ apart is its "no-code" approach, making it usable even for teams without programming expertise. It's designed for various software types, including websites, mobile apps, and APIs. ACCELQ promises significant time savings and increased efficiency in software development.
PractiTest is a cloud-based platform designed to manage software testing. It brings together all your testing processes, teams, and tools into one place. This allows for clear communication and a single source of truth for your entire organization. With PractiTest, you gain valuable insights from customizable reports and dashboards, helping your team work smarter and deliver better products. It integrates with popular tools and helps streamline your quality assurance efforts.
Rainforest QA helps software companies test their applications quickly and affordably. They use a combination of artificial intelligence and experienced QA professionals to create, maintain, and run automated tests. This lets your developers focus on building your product instead of getting bogged down writing and fixing tests. Rainforest QA is particularly helpful for fast-growing software companies who want to release new features quickly without sacrificing quality.
Flosum is a software platform designed specifically for Salesforce users to manage and secure their data and applications. It helps businesses improve the way they build, test, and release Salesforce updates with tools for version control, deployment automation, and data backup. This ensures a smoother, faster, and safer experience for making changes within Salesforce, leading to increased efficiency and reduced risk. Flosum prioritizes data security by keeping information within your Salesforce environment, unlike competitors that might require external access.
Postman is a popular platform used by developers to work with APIs (connections between software). It helps teams build, test, and manage these APIs throughout their entire lifespan. Postman prioritizes collaboration, quality, security, and efficiency for software development teams of all sizes.
DevTest by Broadcom is a software tool designed to help mid-sized and larger companies manage their software testing processes. It works for both traditional and agile development approaches. DevTest provides a centralized platform to organize, plan, and track testing efforts, ultimately helping teams deliver higher-quality software.
Michal has worked at startups for many years and writes about topics relating to software selection and IT
management. As a former consultant for Bain, a business advisory company, he also knows how to understand needs
of any business and find solutions to its problems.
TT
Tymon Terlikiewicz
CTO at Gralio
Tymon is a seasoned CTO who loves finding the perfect tools for any task. He recently headed up the tech
department at Batmaid, a well-known Swiss company, where he managed about 60 software purchases, including CX,
HR, Payroll, Marketing automation and various developer tools.
How are we doing?
Is this information helpful to you? Is there anything we are missing?