Confluence vs Coda

by Gralio Mar 11, 2025

Confluence and Coda are both collaborative workspaces, but they cater to different needs. Confluence excels in structured knowledge bases and integrations within the Atlassian ecosystem, while Coda offers greater flexibility and customizability for diverse workflows. Confluence may be better for larger, established teams, while Coda is often preferred by smaller, more agile teams seeking a unified, adaptable workspace.

At Gralio.ai we help to simplify your decision-making process by offering detailed, side-by-side software comparisons like this one, to help you confidently choose the tool that aligns with your business goals.

This comparison was created by analysing 5405 reviews and 60 websites, saving 1 day, 6 hours, 31 minutes of reading.

Confluence

Website LinkedIn Twitter

Coda

Website LinkedIn Twitter

About

Confluence is a collaborative workspace designed to streamline teamwork and knowledge sharing. It allows you to create, organize, and collaborate on documents, projects, and ideas in one central hub. This eliminates scattered information and keeps everyone on the same page. Confluence integrates with other tools and is highly customizable to adapt to various team needs, from product launches to marketing strategies.

Coda is a collaborative workspace tool that combines aspects of documents, spreadsheets, and applications. It allows teams to create customized documents with integrated features such as tables, buttons, and automations. Coda aims to centralize information, streamline workflows, and replace multiple single-purpose tools. It's suitable for various teams and tasks like project management, OKR tracking, and creating knowledge bases. Coda is free for individual use with tiered paid plans for teams.

Summary

Main difference

Confluence is a robust platform best suited for established teams prioritizing structured knowledge management and seamless integration with other Atlassian products. Coda shines with its flexible, customizable "building blocks" approach, making it ideal for smaller, agile teams who value adaptable workflows and a single, unified workspace.

Relative strengths of Confluence (compared to Coda)

Strong integration with other Atlassian tools like Jira and Trello.
Structured hierarchy and organization with spaces, pages, and templates for efficient knowledge management.
Robust permission controls for granular access management and data security.

Relative weaknesses of Confluence (compared to Coda)

Less flexible and customizable than Coda, particularly for non-traditional workflows.
Can become complex for smaller teams or simpler projects.
Pricing can be less favorable for smaller teams due to its user-based model.

What companies are using Confluence and Coda?

No data

Who should use Confluence VS. Coda

Confluence centralizes teamwork and knowledge sharing, enabling efficient collaboration on documents and projects. Users praise its ease of use and search functionality, while some find the editor basic and desire better organization tools. A great option for teams seeking a central hub for documentation and project management.

Coda centralizes team workflows and knowledge sharing. Users praise its flexibility and integrations but note mobile app shortcomings. Perfect for teams needing a customizable, all-in-one workspace solution.

Ideal for teams of all sizes needing streamlined collaboration and knowledge sharing.
A good fit for software, IT, and telecom companies; suitable for various other industries.

Ideal for small to large businesses seeking a centralized workspace.
Best fit for Healthcare, Finance, Education, and Software/IT.

Confluence and Coda features

Supported

Partially supported

Not supported

Type in the name of the feature or in your own words tell us what you need

Pages

Partially supported

Confluence supports flexible pages, templates, and blogs, but not an AI editor.

Supported

Coda offers flexible pages, AI editor, templates, and document sharing for blog-like content.
Diagrams

Partially supported

Confluence supports diagrams via integration with draw.io, enabling collaborative editing.

Partially supported

Diagrams are supported via integration with Lucidchart, Lucidspark, and Lucidscale.
Team collaboration

Supported

Confluence supports team collaboration with shared workspaces, messaging, and file sharing.

Supported

Coda supports team collaboration through shared workspaces, messaging, and file sharing.
Real-time collaboration

Supported

Confluence supports real-time collaboration, allowing multiple users to work together on documents or projects simultaneously.

Supported

Coda supports real-time collaboration, enabling team members to work together on documents or projects simultaneously.
Content Collaboration

Supported

Confluence allows simultaneous document editing and commenting.

Supported

Coda supports real-time co-editing, commenting, and mentioning features.
Shared knowledge base

Supported

Confluence supports the ability for teams to store, share, and collaborate on information and resources.

Supported

Coda supports the creation of a shared knowledge base for teams to store, share, and collaborate on information and resources.

Qualities

Value and Pricing Transparency

-0.85

Strongly negative sentiment

No data
Customer Service

-0.43

Rather negative sentiment

No data
Ease of Use

+0.71

Strongly positive sentiment

No data
Reliability and Performance

-0.03

Neutral sentiment

No data
Ease of Implementation

+0

Neutral sentiment

No data
Scalability

-0.75

Strongly negative sentiment

No data

Confluence and Coda Pricing

No data

User sentiment

Strongly negative

-0.85

See full Pricing page

Coda's pricing is based on Doc Makers. Doc Makers can create new docs and pages. Editors are free. Viewers can look and comment but can't edit. Coda AI is included for Doc Makers.

Plans

See full Pricing page

Confluence and Coda review insights

4942 reviews analysed from and

Users love

Easy to use, searching and getting instant results
Easy to manage all projects documentation
Great to store crucial documentation and notes
The "children pages" macro is very helpful when building multi-layered playbooks

Flexibility and customizability for building docs and workflows
Powerful formula language, enabling a variety of automations
Extensive integrations with other tools and platforms through Packs
Intuitive and collaborative document editing experience

Users dislike

The editor is very basic and needs more functionality
Search sometimes doesn’t give accurate results
Difficult to organize documentation as per the required groups
The page tree should be more creative to customize the viewing

Mobile app sign-in issues require a separate login
Mobile app performance is slow, especially with larger docs
Some find the table features unintuitive, especially when linking data
Inability to set more granular sharing permissions on a page level

Confluence and Coda Ratings

G2

4.1/5

(2519)
Capterra

4.5/5

(2423)

G2

4.7/5

(461)
TrustPilot

3.8/5

(2)
Glassdoor

4.3/5

(45)

Company health

Employee growth

No data

No change in the last year

Web traffic

No data

24% decrease in the last quarter

Financing

No data

November 2022 - $240M

How customizable are Confluence and Coda for specific workflows?

Both Confluence and Coda offer strong customization options for specific workflows. Confluence allows customization through templates, macros, and integrations with other tools, making it adaptable to various team needs. Coda, with its building block approach of tables, buttons, and automations within documents, allows for highly tailored and integrated workflows within its documents. While both are customizable, Coda's approach allows for more complex and integrated workflows within individual documents, whereas Confluence's customization is more spread across the platform.

Which product better integrates tables, buttons, and automations within documents?

Coda better integrates tables, buttons, and automations within documents. Coda's core design philosophy centers around these interactive elements, allowing users to build customized "docs" that function like mini-apps. While Confluence allows for collaboration and document creation, its focus is less on embedded interactive elements and automation within the document itself.

What are the advantages of Confluence?

Confluence excels in ease of use and search functionality, making it simple to find information quickly. It's particularly well-suited for managing project documentation and creating structured knowledge bases using features like "children pages." Confluence also integrates well with other tools, making it a valuable addition to existing workflows.

What are the disadvantages of Confluence?

Confluence's editor is considered basic, lacking some desired functionalities. The search function can sometimes yield inaccurate results, and organizing documentation effectively can be challenging. Additionally, users have expressed a desire for more customization options within the page tree structure. Finally, some users dislike Confluence's limited scalability.

Alternatives to Confluence and Coda

Notion

Notion is an all-in-one workspace platform designed to help teams organize information, manage projects, and collaborate effectively. It centralizes notes, documents, tasks, and databases, making it easy for teams to access and share information. Notion allows users to customize their workspace with templates and integrations and offers AI features for writing assistance and information retrieval. It aims to be a flexible solution that adapts to various work styles and replaces the need for multiple single-purpose tools.

Document360

Document360 is a software platform designed for businesses to create and manage internal knowledge bases and customer-facing help centers. It offers tools for writing, organizing, and publishing various types of content, including FAQs, product manuals, and company policies. Document360 helps streamline information sharing, reduce support requests, and improve team productivity through features like version control, analytics, and integrations with popular platforms. Its AI-powered search and content generation capabilities aim to simplify knowledge management and deliver faster, more accurate answers to user inquiries.

ClickUp

ClickUp is a comprehensive work management platform designed to consolidate various work processes into one centralized location. It offers a wide array of features including task management, project planning, document collaboration, communication tools, goal setting, and automation options. ClickUp aims to enhance team collaboration, improve visibility across projects, and streamline workflows for increased productivity regardless of team size or industry.

Slite

Slite is a knowledge base software that helps teams organize and access company information. It offers AI-powered search to quickly find answers, along with features for creating and managing documentation. Slite aims to be a central repository for all types of company knowledge, from onboarding materials to meeting notes, and is designed to be easy to use and adopt. The software is used by various teams, including finance, support, and product teams, to maintain a single source of truth.

Airtable

Airtable is a flexible work platform used by teams to organize projects and streamline workflows. It's like a spreadsheet, but with added features for project management, task tracking, and automation. It allows you to build custom applications without coding, making it adaptable to various departments and use cases like marketing, sales, and product development. Airtable aims to improve team collaboration and efficiency by centralizing information and automating tasks.

MarkUp

MarkUp.io is a visual commenting platform designed to simplify how teams review and provide feedback on digital content. It allows users to upload various file types, including websites, PDFs, and images, and then comment directly on the content itself. This visual approach aims to provide clearer feedback and streamline approvals, replacing email chains and messy spreadsheets. MarkUp.io offers features like pixel-accurate annotations, comment attachments, and integrations with popular tools. While it caters to a range of users, its focus on visual feedback makes it particularly well-suited for teams working on design, marketing, and creative content.

Page co-authored by

Michal Kaczor

CEO at Gralio

Michal has worked at startups for many years and writes about topics relating to software selection and IT management. As a former consultant for Bain, a business advisory company, he also knows how to understand needs of any business and find solutions to its problems.

Tymon Terlikiewicz

CTO at Gralio

Tymon is a seasoned CTO who loves finding the perfect tools for any task. He recently headed up the tech department at Batmaid, a well-known Swiss company, where he managed about 60 software purchases, including CX, HR, Payroll, Marketing automation and various developer tools.

How are we doing?

Is this information helpful to you? Is there anything we are missing?

Did this help you select your product?

Other issues? Vote & Let us know