Ashby and Greenhouse are leading recruiting platforms with distinct strengths. Ashby excels in analytics and user experience, while Greenhouse shines in integrations and diversity and inclusion features. The best choice depends on your specific needs and priorities regarding data analysis, ease of use, and integration capabilities.
At Gralio.ai we help to simplify your decision-making process by offering detailed, side-by-side
software comparisons like this one, to help you confidently choose the tool that aligns with your
business goals.
This comparison was created by analysing 2973 reviews and 60
websites, saving 17 hours, 1 minute of reading.
Ashby
Greenhouse
About
Ashby is a recruiting software platform designed for small to large businesses. It combines applicant tracking, candidate relationship management, interview scheduling, and analytics into one system. Ashby aims to streamline the hiring process, improve candidate experience, and provide data-driven insights for better decision-making. It offers customizable workflows, automation features, and reporting tools to help companies manage their recruitment process effectively.
Greenhouse is a popular hiring software designed for growing businesses. It streamlines and automates the entire hiring process, from finding and attracting candidates to interviewing and onboarding new hires. Greenhouse helps companies design a structured hiring process, improve candidate experience, and make data-driven hiring decisions. It's known for its focus on diversity and inclusion, offering tools to reduce bias in the process.
Summary
Main difference
Ashby is a strong choice for its robust analytics, reporting, and user-friendly interface, making it ideal for data-driven recruitment teams. Greenhouse excels with its extensive integrations and focus on diversity and inclusion, better serving companies prioritizing a broad reach and inclusive hiring practices.
Relative strengths of Ashby (compared to Greenhouse)
Stronger analytics and reporting capabilities provide deeper insights into the hiring process.
More user-friendly interface praised for its clean design and ease of use.
Better customer support and onboarding experience, contributing to smoother implementation.
Relative weaknesses of Ashby (compared to Greenhouse)
Limited integrations compared to Greenhouse's extensive ecosystem.
Less focus on diversity and inclusion features.
Sourcing functionalities are not as streamlined as Greenhouse's broader reach.
Who should use Ashby VS. Greenhouse
Ashby is an intuitive recruiting platform ideal for ambitious, data-driven teams. Users praise its clean design, seamless interview scheduling, and robust analytics. However, some find the UI overwhelming and desire more hands-on implementation support. Ashby continuously improves based on user feedback.
Greenhouse is a popular applicant tracking system (ATS) ideal for growing businesses seeking to streamline their hiring process. Users praise its intuitive interface, note-taking features, and integrations. However, some find the candidate survey and new profile layout cumbersome. Greenhouse offers tools to improve candidate experience, reduce bias, and make data-driven hiring decisions.
Best for small to medium-sized businesses (1-1000 employees).
No specific industry fit identified.
Best fit for small to medium-sized businesses scaling their hiring.
Suitable for IT, professional services, and other industries focused on structured hiring.
Ashby and Greenhouse features
Supported
Partially supported
Not supported
Type in the name of the feature or in your own words tell us what you need
HR system integration
Supported
Ashby integrates with various HR systems, including Workday, HiBob, and ChartHop.
Partially supported
Greenhouse integrates with HR systems like Workday, ADP, Paylocity, and UltiPro via third party tools.
Recruiting platform
Supported
Ashby is an all-in-one recruiting platform supporting sourcing, screening, and onboarding indirectly via integrations.
Supported
Greenhouse is an all-in-one recruiting platform supporting the entire recruitment process.
Interview Scheduling
Supported
Ashby supports interview scheduling with auto-scheduling, dynamic interviewers, and automated reminders.
Supported
Greenhouse supports interview scheduling and candidate communication management.
Candidate Relationship Management
Supported
Ashby provides tools to manage candidate relationships, build talent pools, and engage prospects.
Supported
Greenhouse supports candidate relationship management, talent pools, and prospect engagement.
ATS integrations
Supported
Ashby advertises integration with various Applicant Tracking Systems.
Supported
Greenhouse, being an ATS itself, excels in integrations to streamline hiring. It offers 450+ integrations with tools like Veremark and headcount365, enhancing workflows and data sync. Its customizable workflows and careers page integrations further amplify its capabilities.
Applicant Tracking
Supported
Ashby provides an intuitive pipeline management interface where stages and tasks are clearly outlined for efficient tracking of candidates through the hiring process. Recruiters can track key metrics and performance indicators, including candidate progress, through Ashby\'s advanced analytics and reporting capabilities.
Supported
Greenhouse allows for tracking candidate application progress through features like a centralized candidate information hub, automated task management, and a candidate activity feed.
Intuitive and user-friendly interface, praised for its clean design.
Seamless interview scheduling and automation features.
Robust analytics and reporting tools provide valuable data insights.
Excellent customer support and onboarding experience.
Constant feature releases and improvements based on user feedback.
Easy to use and intuitive
The "Notes" feature is very useful
Lots of integrations available
Excellent customer support
Users dislike
The UI can be overwhelming with data, especially deep in a candidate's profile.
Implementation support could be more hands-on.
Some sourcing functionalities are not as streamlined as competitors'.
Learning curve for analytics dashboards and reporting.
Occasional bugs and inaccurate data in reporting require double-checking.
The candidate survey should be more flexible and adaptable
The new candidate profile layout is confusing and requires more clicks
The search function can be a little wonky
No flexibility in scorecard creation
Ashby and Greenhouse Ratings
G2
4.7/5
(66)
Glassdoor
4.6/5
(5)
G2
4.4/5
(2237)
Capterra
4.5/5
(670)
Glassdoor
3.4/5
(320)
Company health
Employee growth
71% increase in the last year
7% increase in the last year
Web traffic
3% decrease in the last quarter
4% increase in the last quarter
Financing
February 2024 - $70M
March 2018 - $110M
How do Ashby's analytics compare to Greenhouse's reporting capabilities?
Ashby emphasizes robust analytics and reporting tools as a core feature, aiming to provide data-driven insights for recruiting decisions. While Greenhouse also offers reporting capabilities, user reviews suggest some limitations and inflexibility in areas like scorecard creation and candidate surveys. Ashby users specifically praise the analytics tools, although some note a learning curve. Therefore, Ashby's analytics appear to be a more prominent and potentially more powerful aspect of the platform compared to Greenhouse's reporting.
Which product offers better integration with existing ATS platforms?
Greenhouse offers better integration with existing ATS platforms. While Ashby integrates with some ATSs and is an ATS itself, Greenhouse boasts 450+ integrations and emphasizes its robust ATS integration ecosystem. Therefore, for organizations heavily reliant on connecting with various ATS platforms, Greenhouse appears to be the superior choice.
What are the advantages of Ashby?
Ashby offers superior customer support and a more intuitive, user-friendly interface according to user reviews. It also appears to have a stronger focus on analytics and reporting, providing valuable data insights for better recruitment decisions. While both offer customizable workflows and ATS integrations, Ashby seems to be preferred for its ease of use and helpful customer support experience.
What are the disadvantages of Ashby?
Ashby's disadvantages include a complex UI that can feel overwhelming, especially when viewing detailed candidate profiles. Implementation support is considered less hands-on than desired by some users. Some sourcing functionalities are not as streamlined as those offered by competitors. Finally, users have noted a learning curve for the analytics dashboards and reporting features, as well as occasional bugs and data inaccuracies in reports.
BambooHR is an HR software platform designed for small and medium-sized businesses. It brings together various HR functions like hiring, onboarding, payroll, benefits, and employee data management into one system. This allows for streamlined workflows, automated tasks, and easier access to employee information. BambooHR aims to simplify HR processes, improve data accuracy, and enhance the employee experience. It is used by companies in various industries and boasts features like custom reporting and integrations with other software.
Lever is a talent acquisition suite designed for midsize to enterprise-level companies. It combines applicant tracking (ATS) and candidate relationship management (CRM) tools in one platform. Lever helps businesses streamline their hiring process, from sourcing and attracting candidates to managing applications and building relationships. Its features include automated workflows, analytics and reporting, and integrations with other HR software. Lever aims to improve efficiency, enhance the candidate experience, and promote inclusive hiring practices.
CareerPlug
CareerPlug is a user-friendly hiring software designed for non-HR professionals at growing companies. It simplifies the hiring process from job posting to offer letter, with features like job board integration, communication automation, interview scheduling, and applicant tracking. CareerPlug also offers resources and best practices to help businesses make informed hiring decisions.
Ceipal is an AI-powered recruiting and staffing software designed for companies of all sizes, but particularly beneficial for mid-sized and large businesses. It offers a full suite of tools to manage the entire hiring process, from finding candidates to onboarding new hires. Ceipal helps businesses streamline their hiring process, improve decision-making with data insights, and ultimately save time and money. It stands out with its user-friendly interface, powerful automation features, and focus on providing a personalized experience for both recruiters and candidates.
Paylocity is a cloud-based HR and payroll software platform designed for mid-sized businesses. It offers a range of features including payroll, benefits administration, talent management, time tracking, and employee experience tools. Paylocity aims to streamline HR tasks, improve employee engagement, and provide data-driven insights for better decision-making. They emphasize strong customer support and a partnership approach to help businesses achieve their goals.
OnCall Health, now part of Qualifacts, offers a virtual care platform designed for mental and behavioral health providers. It streamlines administrative tasks such as scheduling, billing, and insurance, allowing providers to focus on patient care. The platform features telehealth tools, a patient portal, and electronic health record (EHR) integration. OnCall Health helps organizations improve efficiency, increase patient engagement, and scale their practices.
How are we doing?
Is this information helpful to you? Is there anything we are missing?