Arch vs Slackware

by Gralio Mar 13, 2025

Arch Linux and Slackware cater to experienced Linux users, but with different philosophies. Arch offers a highly customizable and up-to-date system with a vast software repository, ideal for users who prioritize access to the latest software. Slackware focuses on simplicity, stability, and adherence to Unix principles, providing a more traditional and controlled Linux environment.

At Gralio.ai we help to simplify your decision-making process by offering detailed, side-by-side software comparisons like this one, to help you confidently choose the tool that aligns with your business goals.

This comparison was created by analysing 67 reviews and 60 websites, saving 52 minutes of reading.

About

Arch Linux is a free, open-source operating system primarily designed for experienced computer users. It emphasizes user customization and control, offering a highly flexible and minimal system. Unlike operating systems with pre-installed software, Arch Linux users build their system from scratch, choosing only the components they need. While not as user-friendly as other operating systems, Arch Linux offers greater flexibility and control for users comfortable managing their own system.
Slackware is a Linux operating system known for its focus on simplicity and staying true to traditional Unix principles. It prioritizes stability and giving experienced users flexibility and control over their system. Slackware includes popular software but expects users to be comfortable with system administration tasks.

Summary

Main difference
Arch Linux is distinguished by its rolling release model, providing users with the latest software updates, and the Arch User Repository (AUR), offering a vast collection of user-contributed packages. Slackware, conversely, emphasizes stability and adherence to Unix principles, offering a more traditional Linux experience.

Relative strengths of Arch (compared to Slackware)

  • Extensive software availability through the AUR.

  • Cutting-edge software with the rolling release model.

  • Highly customizable and flexible system.

Relative weaknesses of Arch (compared to Slackware)

  • Steeper learning curve and more complex setup.

  • Potential instability due to rolling releases.

  • Requires more manual system maintenance.

Who should use Arch VS. Slackware

Arch Linux is a highly customizable, minimalist OS ideal for experienced Linux users. Its flexibility and control are praised, but the complex setup and steep learning curve can be challenging for beginners. The active community provides support, despite occasional reports of unfriendliness.

Slackware is a Linux OS prioritizing stability and control for experienced users. Its simple design and fast installation are praised, but its challenging setup and manual package management are drawbacks. Best for those comfortable with the command-line interface.

  • Ideal for tech-savvy individuals and small teams seeking a highly customizable OS.

  • Well-suited for the Software, IT, & Telecommunications industry where customization and control are critical.

  • Ideal for small to large enterprises seeking a stable and customizable OS.

  • Well-suited for IT professionals and software developers.

Arch and Slackware features

Supported
Partially supported
Not supported
Type in the name of the feature or in your own words tell us what you need
  • Lightweight and flexible
    Supported

    Arch Linux is lightweight and highly customizable to specific needs.

    Supported

    Slackware is lightweight and flexible due to its minimalist design and customization options.

  • Rolling release model
    Supported

    Arch Linux fully supports the rolling release model.

    Partially supported

    Slackware offers a development branch with rolling updates, but it is not a true rolling release.

  • Simple and straightforward system
    Supported

    Arch Linux prioritizes a simple and straightforward system by minimizing unnecessary additions.

    Supported

    Slackware is designed to be simple and straightforward, aligning with the KISS principle.

  • User-contributed package repository
    Supported

    Arch Linux offers the AUR, a community repository of user-contributed packages.

    Partially supported

    Slackware supports user-contributed packages via community tools and custom repositories.

  • Driver availability
    Supported

    Arch Linux supports a wide range of device drivers through a modular kernel and community support.

    Supported

    Slackware supports a wide array of device drivers via kernel modules.

  • System Configuration
    Supported

    Arch Linux offers various tools like aconfmgr and Arch Mate for system configuration.

    Supported

    Slackware offers system configuration tools like setup, pkgtool and configuration scripts.

Qualities

  • Value and Pricing Transparency
    No data
    No data
  • Customer Service
    No data
    No data
  • Ease of Use
    No data
    No data
  • Reliability and Performance
    +0.33
    Rather positive sentiment
    No data
  • Ease of Implementation
    No data
    No data
  • Scalability
    No data
    No data
Arch and Slackware Pricing
No data
We couldn't find a pricing page for Arch.
No data
We couldn't find a pricing page for Slackware.

Arch and Slackware review insights

62 reviews analysed from

Users love

  • Highly customizable and allows for a personalized system
  • Minimalist approach with no bloatware
  • Excellent package management with Pacman and AUR
  • Access to cutting-edge software and latest updates
  • Active and helpful community support (despite some reports of unfriendliness)
  • Simple and lightweight design.
  • Fast installation process.
  • Stable and reliable performance.
  • Highly customizable and flexible.
  • Offers a pure Linux experience.

Users dislike

  • Difficult installation process for beginners
  • Potential system instability due to rolling releases and AUR packages
  • Steep learning curve and requires advanced Linux knowledge
  • Occasional driver issues, especially with graphics cards
  • Limited official support and reliance on community forums
  • Initial setup can be challenging for new users.
  • Can be prone to crashing under heavy load.
  • Requires manual package management and dependency resolution.
  • Limited software repository compared to other distributions.
  • Steep learning curve for beginners.

Arch and Slackware Ratings

  • G2
    4.4/5
    (33)
  • TrustPilot
    4.2/5
    (5)
  • G2
    4.3/5
    (29)

Company health

Employee growth

No change in the last year
No change in the last year

Web traffic

10% decrease in the last quarter
No data

Financing

No data
No data

How important is a rolling release model versus stability?

The choice between a rolling release model (like Arch) and a stable release model (like Slackware) depends on the user's priorities. Rolling releases provide constant access to the latest software and features but can introduce instability. Stable releases prioritize reliability and thorough testing but may lag behind in feature updates. For users who value up-to-date software and are comfortable troubleshooting, a rolling release is suitable. For users who prioritize stability and require a predictable environment, a stable release model is preferred.

Which AUR or Slackware's simpler package management better suits my needs?

Slackware's simpler package management is generally considered easier to learn and manage than Arch's AUR and Pacman combination. While AUR offers access to a vast user-contributed repository, it also introduces potential instability and requires more manual intervention. If you prioritize simplicity and a more traditional Unix-like experience, Slackware is a better fit. However, if you value extensive customization and access to cutting-edge software and don't mind the added complexity, Arch Linux might be preferable.

What are the advantages of Arch?

Arch Linux offers a rolling release model for constant access to the latest software, a minimalist design without bloatware, and a vast user-contributed package repository (AUR) expanding software options beyond the official repositories. It also emphasizes user customization and control, allowing for a highly personalized system.

What are the disadvantages of Arch?

Arch Linux presents a steep learning curve and requires advanced Linux knowledge, making it unsuitable for beginners. The rolling release model, while offering the latest software, can introduce instability. The installation process is known to be difficult, and while community support is active, it is sometimes perceived as unfriendly. Finally, reliance on the AUR for certain packages can also introduce instability due to the varying quality of user-contributed packages.

Alternatives to Arch and Slackware

Logo of Ubuntu
arch vs Ubuntu
Ubuntu is a free, open-source operating system known for its speed and user-friendliness. Popular with developers, Ubuntu offers a secure platform for both daily tasks and professional software development. It boasts a large collection of applications and is compatible with a wide range of hardware, from modern laptops to older computers. Ubuntu also integrates well with enterprise environments, especially with the added support of Ubuntu Pro.
Read more
Logo of Debian
arch vs Debian
Debian is a free and open-source operating system known for its stability and security. It's like the foundation of a house, providing the core software to run your computer system. Debian offers a wide range of applications and software, making it suitable for various purposes. It stands out for its large, active community of developers who ensure its reliability and provide support.
Read more
Logo of Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Red Hat Enterprise Linux is a stable operating system used by businesses of all sizes. It's known for its flexibility and security, especially important for companies moving operations online. Red Hat offers support, helping your business use this system whether your data is stored locally, or accessed through the cloud.
Read more
Logo of Fedora
arch vs Fedora
Fedora is a free, Linux-based operating system that offers a secure and customizable experience for a variety of uses. It provides different editions tailored for desktops, servers, cloud computing, and the Internet of Things. Known for its innovative features and regular updates, Fedora is driven by a large community of developers.
Read more
Logo of Linux Mint
Linux Mint
Linux Mint is a free, full-featured operating system for desktops and laptops. It's designed for ease of use, resembling familiar operating systems, and comes with pre-installed productivity, multimedia, and internet applications. Linux Mint prioritizes user experience and a stable, reliable system with long-term support releases. It boasts a large and active community offering support and resources.
Read more
Logo of BunsenLabs
BunsenLabs
BunsenLabs Linux is a desktop operating system that prioritizes speed and customization. Built upon Debian Linux, it offers a streamlined experience with the Openbox window manager. Users can personalize their desktops with various themes and tools. While providing a user-friendly interface, BunsenLabs is particularly well-suited for those comfortable with Linux and seeking a highly configurable system.
Read more
Page co-authored by
MK
Michal Kaczor
CEO at Gralio

Michal has worked at startups for many years and writes about topics relating to software selection and IT management. As a former consultant for Bain, a business advisory company, he also knows how to understand needs of any business and find solutions to its problems.

TT
Tymon Terlikiewicz
CTO at Gralio

Tymon is a seasoned CTO who loves finding the perfect tools for any task. He recently headed up the tech department at Batmaid, a well-known Swiss company, where he managed about 60 software purchases, including CX, HR, Payroll, Marketing automation and various developer tools.

How are we doing?

Is this information helpful to you? Is there anything we are missing?
Did this help you select your product?
Other issues? Vote & Let us know